0.00/0.05	% Problem  : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.07	% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.s1dIdJHNq8 true
0.17/0.44	% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
0.17/0.44	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.17/0.44	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.17/0.44	% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
0.17/0.44	% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
0.17/0.44	% CPULimit : 1440
0.17/0.44	% WCLimit  : 180
0.17/0.44	% DateTime : Mon Jul 27 11:54:07 UTC 2026
0.17/0.44	% CPUTime  : 
0.17/0.44	% Running portfolio for 1440 s
0.17/0.44	% File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.17/0.45	% Number of cores: 8
0.17/0.45	% Python version: Python 3.12.3
0.17/0.45	% Running in HO mode
0.55/0.76	% Total configuration time : 828
0.55/0.76	% Estimated wc time : 1656
0.55/0.76	% Estimated cpu time (8 cpus) : 207.0
0.60/0.86	% /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c.s.sh running for 80s
0.60/0.89	% Solved by lams/40_c.s.sh.
0.60/0.89	% done 0 iterations in 0.011s
0.60/0.89	% SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
0.60/0.89	% SZS output start Refutation
0.60/0.89	thf(cartesian_product_type, type, cartesian_product: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > 
0.60/0.89	                                                     $i > $i > $o).
0.60/0.89	thf(sub_rel_type, type, sub_rel: ($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $i > $o) > $o).
0.60/0.89	thf(sub_rel, axiom,(( sub_rel  ) =
0.60/0.89	  (^[R1:( $i > $i > $o ),R2:( $i > $i > $o )]:
0.60/0.89	   ( ![X:$i,Y:$i]: ( ( R1 @ X @ Y ) => ( R2 @ X @ Y ) ) )))).
0.60/0.89	thf('0', plain,
0.60/0.89	    (( sub_rel ) =
0.60/0.89	     ( ^[R1:( $i > $i > $o ),R2:( $i > $i > $o )]:
0.60/0.89	       ( ![X:$i,Y:$i]: ( ( R1 @ X @ Y ) => ( R2 @ X @ Y ) ) ) )),
0.60/0.89	    inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [sub_rel])).
0.60/0.89	thf('1', plain,
0.60/0.89	    (( sub_rel ) =
0.60/0.89	     ( ^[V_1:( $i > $i > $o ),V_2:( $i > $i > $o )]:
0.60/0.89	       ( ![X4:$i,X6:$i]: ( ( V_1 @ X4 @ X6 ) => ( V_2 @ X4 @ X6 ) ) ) )),
0.60/0.89	    define([status(thm)])).
0.60/0.89	thf(cartesian_product, axiom,(( cartesian_product  ) =
0.60/0.89	  (^[X:( $i > $o ),Y:( $i > $o ),U:$i,V:$i]: ( ( X @ U ) & ( Y @ V ) )))).
0.60/0.89	thf('2', plain,
0.60/0.89	    (( cartesian_product ) =
0.60/0.89	     ( ^[X:( $i > $o ),Y:( $i > $o ),U:$i,V:$i]: ( ( X @ U ) & ( Y @ V ) ) )),
0.60/0.89	    inference('simplify_rw_rule', [status(thm)], [cartesian_product])).
0.60/0.89	thf('3', plain,
0.60/0.89	    (( cartesian_product ) =
0.60/0.89	     ( ^[V_1:( $i > $o ),V_2:( $i > $o ),V_3:$i,V_4:$i]:
0.60/0.89	       ( ( V_1 @ V_3 ) & ( V_2 @ V_4 ) ) )),
0.60/0.89	    define([status(thm)])).
0.60/0.89	thf(thm, conjecture,
0.60/0.89	  (![R:( $i > $i > $o ),Q:( $i > $i > $o )]:
0.60/0.89	   ( ( sub_rel @ R @ Q ) =>
0.60/0.89	     ( sub_rel @
0.60/0.89	       R @ 
0.60/0.89	       ( cartesian_product @ ( ^[X:$i]: ( $true ) ) @ ( ^[X:$i]: ( $true ) ) ) ) ))).
0.60/0.89	thf(zf_stmt_0, conjecture,
0.60/0.89	  (![X4:( $i > $i > $o ),X6:( $i > $i > $o )]:
0.60/0.89	   ( ( ![X8:$i,X10:$i]: ( ( X4 @ X8 @ X10 ) => ( X6 @ X8 @ X10 ) ) ) =>
0.60/0.89	     ( ![X12:$i,X14:$i]: ( $true ) ) ))).
0.60/0.89	thf(zf_stmt_1, negated_conjecture,
0.60/0.89	  (~( ![X4:( $i > $i > $o ),X6:( $i > $i > $o )]:
0.60/0.89	      ( ( ![X8:$i,X10:$i]: ( ( X4 @ X8 @ X10 ) => ( X6 @ X8 @ X10 ) ) ) =>
0.60/0.89	        ( ![X12:$i,X14:$i]: ( $true ) ) ) )),
0.60/0.89	  inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
0.60/0.89	thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain, ($false),
0.60/0.89	    inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_1])).
0.60/0.89	
0.60/0.89	% SZS output end Refutation
0.60/0.89	
0.60/0.89	
0.60/0.89	% Terminating...
0.60/0.93	% Runner terminated.
0.60/0.95	% Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
0.60/0.96	EOF